The mind puts chains around sentience so familiar that we were born into them…
Amongst other things, perception can be (please excuse these newly made terms):
Reconstruction: Seeing separate pieces and creating a separate pattern or relationship from them. Example: seeing a group of trees as a forest
Deconstruction: Seeing the whole and mentally partitioning it. Example: seeing a forest as a group of trees
Preconstruction: Projecting expectations on an event yet to be perceived. Example: dreading going into this forest to look at trees in the first place
Postconstruction: Projecting beliefs and values onto past experience (memories) Example: remembering how much fun you actually had looking at those trees
But, can it ever be truely ‘seeing?‘
If we think in language, are our thoughts bound by the limits of speech?
If I think in Italian, is my view of the world infused with more passion than someone who thinks in German?
And if we don’t think ‘in’ language, what do we think in? Feelings? Images?
If I am brought up in an environment where I do not learn a spoken language, what form does my internal dialogue take?
Is this how some animals think?
If not bounded by language’s constraints, what are the boundaries on our thoughts?
There must be some kind of boundaries, after all, what stops us thinking up the answers to everything? A lack of reference points? Can we think ‘outside of boundaries’ or is that like trying to stand erect on a floor that is not there?
And if we are truly looking for an objective view, can we as humans ever find it through the filter of our own thoughts?
In looking for a supremely objective view, what perspective, if any, can we take?